# Trump administration considers mandatory pre-release vetting of AI models — Anthropic's Mythos cited as catalyst for policy reversal — retained record

> Retained news record from news:toms-hardware.

Canonical: https://highsignal.app/data/records/0aea9c55342f2113

[← sources](https://highsignal.app/data)


source: [news](https://highsignal.app/data/news) (news:toms-hardware)  published 2026-05-04 21:33 ingested 2026-05-05 07:56

[original source ↗](https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/trump-administration-considers-mandatory-pre-release-vetting-of-ai-models)

## extract

Trump administration considers mandatory pre-release vetting of AI models — Anthropic's Mythos cited as catalyst for policy reversal
The company that wanted AI regulation under Biden may have gotten its wish, just not on its own terms.
The Trump administration is said to be discussing an executive order that would establish a government review process for new AI models before they’re released to the public, The New York Times has reported, citing unnamed U.S. officials.
The proposed order would create an “AI working group” of tech executives and government officials to develop oversight procedures, with White House staff briefing leaders from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI on the plans last week. These discussions, if true, would represent a sharp departure from the administration’s current stance as something of a deregulatory champion — immediately upon taking office, the Trump administration revoked a Biden-era executive order addressing AI risks.
The sudden reversal coincides with a leadership vacuum in White House AI policy. David Sacks, who led the administration's deregulation push as AI czar, left the role in March, with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having since taken a more active role in shaping AI policy, according to The New York Times.
Article continues belowThe new approach sounds a lot like the UK's AI Security Institute model, where government bodies evaluate frontier models against safety benchmarks before and after deployment. Officials told the New York Times that the NSA, the Office of the National Cyber Director, and the Director of National Intelligence could oversee the review. Critically, the system would grant the government early access to models without blocking their release.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the catalyst for all this appears to have been Anthropic’s Mythos model, which the company’s marketing described as capable of finding thousands of critical software vulnerabilities and too dangerous for public release.
That naturally attracted a lot of unwanted government attention at a time when the Trump administration is already locking horns with Anthropic over the collapsed $200 million Pentagon contract. The Pentagon designated Anthropic a supply chain risk after the company refused to remove guardrails on autonomous weapons and mass surveillance, though a federal judge later called that "Orwellian."
The NSA has already used Mythos to assess vulnerabilities in government Microsoft software deployments, even as other agencies remain cut off from Anthropic's tools. Some analysts have questioned whether Mythos's capabilities justify Anthropic's dramatic framing, with some studies finding that cheaper models can achieve comparable results in vulnerability discovery.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
A White House official told The New York Times that talk of an executive order is "speculation," and that any announcement would come from Trump himself. Dean Ball, a former senior adviser on AI in the Trump administration, told the newspaper that officials are trying to avoid overregulation while keeping pace with the technology, calling it a “tricky balance.”
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
Scott_Tx Let's see, if the going rate for being able to sell a router in USA is 1 golden ballroom the cost for a new AI should be about... 5?Reply -
chaos215bar2 So, presumably, what they really want is to punish Anthropic for standing up to the administration and drawing a clear line where their models may and may not be used for military purposes.Reply -
hotaru251 this administration hasnt cared about ai regulation. just a personal dislike of what others did is why it got rid of stuff in place.Reply -
timsSOFTWARE I wonder if the Trump administration is fully aware that the aura of "Mythos" is mostly a myth, but is trying to get back at Anthropic for non-compliance with the military deal - it seems clear to me that the "Legend of Mythos" was hoped to carry Anthropic through their IPO.Reply
But really, as long as AI is still based on static models that could be validated in this method, it never be able to live up to the hype. The next big step for AI would have to involve self-evolving/updating models - more akin to how human neural networks are updated every night when we sleep.

## retained text

No document body was retained for this record — only its metadata was stored.