← signals
2026-07-20·LANGFLOW·security risk
meddown

Between June 23 and July 20, 2026, the Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV) database published 21 distinct security...

Between June 23 and July 20, 2026, the Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV) database published 21 distinct security advisories for Langflow, an AI workflow tool.

window 15devidence 22confidence score 100

confidence score

Strong evidence: 2 independent source classes support this read.

100
medium confidence2 independent source classesotherpasses publish gate

signal brief

Between June 23 and July 20, 2026, the Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV) database published 21 distinct security advisories for Langflow, an AI workflow tool. The vulnerabilities range from Remote Code Execution (RCE) and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) and missing authentication on critical API endpoints. Notably, several advisories highlight unauthenticated RCE via the 'Shareable Playground' feature (PYSEC-2026-243, PYSEC-2026-244) and arbitrary file read (PYSEC-2026-2566). The volume and severity of these issues indicate systemic security weaknesses that could undermine user trust and enterprise adoption.

What the sources said:

  • PYSEC-2026-243: 'Shareable Playground ... contains a critical RCE vulnerability. The vulnerable field is data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value.' Source
  • PYSEC-2026-242: 'Any authenticated user can read, modify, rename, or permanently delete another user's data by supplying the target's resource ID.' Source
  • PYSEC-2026-377: 'Langflow Knowledge Bases API is Vulnerable to Path Traversal.' Source
  • PYSEC-2026-1523: 'Langflow vulnerable to remote code execution.' Source

The disclosure of over 20 CVEs in a short period signals a lack of security maturity in Langflow's development lifecycle. Enterprises using Langflow for AI agent deployment may face increased risk, potentially slowing adoption or prompting migration to more secure alternatives. The rapid issuance of fixes (up to version 1.11.0.dev49) suggests the vendor is responsive, but the breadth of vulnerabilities may damage long-term trust.

source data used

Decision support, not stock advice. This signal is research with cited evidence — not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.